What changes when replenishment timing or quantity changes?
Compare modeled service, stock and backlog—and cost when governed inputs are available.
Phaneon Rigel
Test inventory and production choices before operational commitment.
Rigel compares bounded alternatives under matched forecast and operating assumptions. Review service, stock, backlog and production-flow evidence without writing to live systems.
Questions Rigel can structure
Compare the consequence, not only the forecast.
Keep each alternative attached to the assumptions and evidence used to produce it.
Where do queues, routings and finite resources reshape output?
Review modeled throughput, WIP, waiting, utilization and bottleneck evidence.
Do alternatives face the same uncertainty and operating context?
Use matched forecast evidence and simulation conditions for a cleaner policy comparison.
Controlled evaluation
A bounded path from question to decision brief.
Name one planning decision and current policy.
Freeze the baseline, scope, horizon, service measure and operational boundary first.
Run alternatives under matched assumptions.
Preserve forecast lineage, simulation seeds and scenario inputs for review.
Carry the result and remaining assumptions together.
A planner brief records the candidate response, unresolved evidence and reason to proceed—or stop.
Operating boundaryNo live-system write-back.
Rigel is implemented evaluation software, not an autonomous planning controller. Customer data access, security review, integrations, calibrated forecast evidence and production authorization remain separate gates.
Frame one operational choice.
No ERP connection or data upload is required for the initial fit discussion.